Criminal Defamation Charges Against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan Dropped

Criminal Defamation Charges Against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan Dropped

Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan at the Federal High Court in Abuja following the withdrawal of criminal defamation charges against her.

Criminal defamation charges filed by the Federal Government against Nigerian senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan have been formally withdrawn, bringing an end to a case that had drawn significant public and political attention.

The Federal High Court of Abuja, on Thursday 15 January 2026, struck out the charges after the Attorney-General of the Federation filed a Notice of Discontinuance, effectively ending the prosecution.

Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan, who represents Kogi Central Senatorial District, had been accused of making defamatory statements against a private individual. The case sparked debate among legal experts, civil society groups and opposition figures, many of whom raised concerns about freedom of expression and the use of criminal defamation laws in Nigeria.

In court, the prosecution offered no further explanation for the withdrawal, while the presiding judge acknowledged the government’s decision and ordered the case struck out.

Reacting to the development, supporters of the senator described the move as a victory for democracy and free speech, arguing that criminal defamation laws are often used to intimidate critics and silence dissenting voices. Several human rights organisations have long called for the repeal of such laws, insisting that civil remedies are more appropriate for defamation disputes.

The Federal Government has yet to issue an official public statement on the matter. However, legal analysts say the withdrawal may signal growing sensitivity to public criticism and judicial scrutiny surrounding politically charged prosecutions.

Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan has not made a detailed public comment but has previously maintained that the charges were politically motivated and aimed at undermining her legislative work.

The case adds to ongoing national conversations about judicial independence, free speech and the boundaries of political accountability in Nigeria.

© 2025 Aliu Azeema | TalkAfricang.com

Filed under: newspolitics

Share this article

Keep Reading

More stories you might find interesting

Fire Outbreak at Murtala Muhammed International Airport; Authorities Launch Investigation Into Cause
news

Fire Outbreak at Murtala Muhammed International Airport; Authorities Launch Investigation Into Cause

fire outbreak distrupts operations at Murtala Muhammed International Airport, sending shockwaves through Nigeria’s busiest aviation hub. The blaze, which affected a section of the international terminal, led to temporary flight disruptions and raised fresh concerns about critical airport infrastructure. Emergency responders swiftly moved to contain the situation, while aviation authorities began assessing the extent of the damage. Although no fatalities have been confirmed, investigations are underway to determine the cause of the incident. More details to follow as the story develops.

Medical Breakthrough: Nigeria Introduces Lenacapavir for HIV prevention
news

Medical Breakthrough: Nigeria Introduces Lenacapavir for HIV prevention

Lenacapavir (Yeztugo) is a long-acting HIV prevention injection given just twice a year, offering a highly effective alternative to daily PrEP pills. Now becoming available in Nigeria at a subsidized cost, it represents a major step forward in expanding access to HIV prevention. While not officially 100% protective, it provides powerful protection when taken correctly under medical supervision.

Consent Is a must: Why We Must Speak Clearly About Rape
health

Consent Is a must: Why We Must Speak Clearly About Rape

Recently we’ve had trending stories which has once again pushed the issue of rape into the spotlight. While the attention is important, the way we discuss rape matters just as much as the discussion itself. Constantly, misinformation, victim-blaming, and silence protect perpetrators (rapist or abusers) while survivors are left unheard. People tend to shift their attention from the main issue on ground when an issue of rape or sexual abuse is spoken about it reported. It is necessary to speak clearly, responsibly, and firmly, irrespective of your gender, rape is violence, and consent is non-negotiable. We cannot say this enough.

Comments (0)

Leave a Comment

0/1000
Loading comments...